Destiny has publicly accused his ex-wife Pxie, the plaintiff in his ongoing revenge porn lawsuit, of deleting crucial chat evidence. During a recent stream, the political commentator alleged that key conversations between himself and the plaintiff were intentionally destroyed after litigation began.
He went further. Destiny stated he plans to file bar complaints against multiple attorneys connected to the plaintiff’s legal team once the case concludes. His stated goal is to get some of them disciplined or disbarred.
“I have pretty strong information and documentation,” Destiny said on stream, adding that he believes the deletion was strategic and will become a major issue in court.
The evidence in question centers on chat logs between Destiny and Pxie. These messages were allegedly deleted from platforms that only retain removed content for about 30 days. By the time subpoenas were issued, the logs were reportedly irretrievable.
In civil cases, destroying relevant evidence after litigation is anticipated can lead to serious sanctions. Courts may infer the destroyed material would have been unfavorable to the party who destroyed it. Destiny appears to be building a spoliation argument to use in court.
The underlying lawsuit stems from allegations that Destiny shared explicit sexual videos of himself and the plaintiff without her consent. She’s suing under a Florida revenge porn statute and related civil claims.
But the case has major complications. The specific Florida statute cited allegedly wasn’t in effect when Destiny originally shared the content. Court transcripts reportedly show the plaintiff herself admitted under oath to sharing explicit videos of a different ex-boyfriend to Destiny without that person’s consent.
A judge hearing the case has reportedly indicated this raises questions about implied consent. If both parties regularly shared such content within their circle, it could undermine the plaintiff’s claim that Destiny’s actions were non-consensual.
There’s also the matter of who actually leaked the videos publicly. Destiny was allegedly catfished by someone posing as an e-girl on social media. That person gained access to explicit content and later leaked numerous sex videos featuring Destiny and multiple partners onto the internet.
The leaker, described in various accounts as a UK-based individual with a history of harassment, targeted Destiny specifically. The plaintiff and other women in the videos were collateral damage in what appears to have been a revenge campaign against Destiny himself.
Yet the plaintiff isn’t suing the leaker. She’s suing Destiny for the initial sharing that predated the public leak.
Destiny’s supporters argue this makes the lawsuit strategically motivated rather than about actual justice for revenge porn victims. They point to alleged discussions in chat logs where the plaintiff expressed interest in financially harming Destiny and damaging his reputation./
Destiny’s threat to pursue bar complaints represents an escalation beyond the lawsuit itself. He’s specifically mentioned targeting Lauren DeLaguna, an attorney he believes encouraged or advised the plaintiff’s legal strategy. DeLaguna isn’t formally counsel of record but has a prior personal history with Destiny.
