Craig “StutteringCraig” Skistimas is running what might be Twitch’s most repetitive broadcast. The ScrewAttack co-founder has been streaming a continuous loop of a viral Hasan Piker clip compilation on his channel.
The stream consists of nothing but the compilation playing over and over. No commentary. No breaks. Just the same collection of Hasan’s most controversial moments on endless repeat.
The clips in question feature Hasan discussing political violence in ways that have set off a lot of arguments on social media. Critics claim these soundbites glorify violence. Hasan’s supporters argue the clips are misleadingly edited and lack crucial context where he redirects toward peaceful political action.
This isn’t the first time someone has re-aired his “out-of-context” clips on Twitch. When Ethan Klein of H3 played his Content Nuke video on Twitch with some of Hasan’s greatest hits, he caught a 30-day temporary ban for “glorifying extreme violence.” The irony wasn’t lost on viewers—Hasan faced no action for the original statements, but Ethan got suspended for rebroadcasting them.
Craig’s approach takes things to another level. Instead of embedding the clips in commentary or criticism, he’s simply letting them play on loop. It’s either the boldest test of Twitch’s enforcement policies or the laziest content strategy of 2025.
Twitch’s rules on violence are clear on paper. Content that glorifies or advocates violence gets removed. But the platform also claims to consider context. Whether an endless loop counts as “context” remains to be seen.
The compilation itself has been bouncing around online for weeks. It stitches together moments from Hasan’s streams that touch on political violence themes. One frequently cited clip involves Hasan discussing the phrase “somebody needs to do it”—though supporters point to the full VOD where he allegedly pivots to encouraging voter registration instead of violence.
As of now, Craig’s stream continues without intervention from Twitch. No statements have emerged from any of the parties involved. The platform faces a tricky decision: Does looping someone else’s controversial content violate the same rules as creating that content? And if so, why hasn’t action been taken?
