xQc has publicly accused Hasan Piker of actively managing how controversies involving him are discussed and covered on streaming platforms.
During a recent stream, xQc claimed that Hasan uses his platform size and relationships with other creators to shape coverage in his favor. He argued that Hasan discourages critical discussion and challenges the credibility of anyone who raises concerns about his actions.
xQc suggested that Hasan’s response to the dog collar incident follows a broader pattern of narrative management. He pointed to how Hasan has addressed the controversy and reached out to other creators as evidence of coordinated damage control.
The remarks came in the context of ongoing scrutiny over footage showing Hasan using an electronic collar on his dog Kaya. The clip has prompted debate about whether the device was set to vibrate or shock mode and whether its use was appropriate.
Electronic collars remain controversial in pet training circles. While some models offer vibration and tone settings, others include static shock functions. Their use is restricted or banned in several countries over animal welfare concerns.
Hasan has addressed the collar controversy on stream and defended his training methods. He maintains that he used the device responsibly and that critics have mischaracterized what happened.
The two streamers have clashed publicly before. Previous disputes have involved heated exchanges over political commentary and platform ethics. Their history adds weight to xQc’s decision to speak out now.
The claim that Hasan specifically engages in this behavior has resonated with some viewers who point to his public statements and interactions with other creators during the collar controversy. Others dismiss xQc’s remarks as baseless or exaggerated.
Neither streamer has provided additional comment following the clip’s circulation. Whether Hasan will directly address the narrative control accusation remains to be seen.
