xQc reopens the Nick Polom and Malena Tudi divorce drama by reading alleged Discord messages on stream

There's nothing like a Juicer broadcast to drag old court exhibits back into the timeline.

Man with headphones livestreaming at desk setup
(Image via xQc on Kick)
TL;DR
  • xQc read alleged Discord messages between Nick "nmplol" Polom and Malena Tudi on stream, framed as exhibits from their divorce case.
  • The messages centered on Nick's control of a bank account, Malena's access without co-ownership, and disputed asset figures around $1.6m.
  • Nick responded publicly, saying the screenshots were out of context and that a judge had already ruled the account arrangement wasn't financial abuse.
Community Reactions
How do you feel about this story?
👍
0
👎
0
😂
0
😡
0
😢
0

xQc has pulled the Nick “nmplol” Polom and Malena Tudi divorce back into the spotlight after reading alleged Discord messages between the former couple live on stream.

The screenshots, described as exhibits tied to the pair’s divorce case, set off fresh arguments over the couple’s finances, bank account access, and how their assets were split. The messages appear to revolve around three main issues: control of Nick’s bank account, Malena’s level of access to it, and the eventual division of assets in the divorce.

Circulating figures suggest the marital estate was valued around $1.6m, with talk of a 50/50 split that would land near $800,000 each. None of those numbers aren’t confirmed by verified court records, and the brief specifically flags them as unverified.

View on Threads

Nick didn’t stay quiet. He publicly stated that the screenshots were “exhibitions from my case that have already been discussed, submitted, and scrutinized by lawyers and judges,” calling them out of context and saying they “had no bearing in the actual court that mattered.”

His main clarification hit the access vs. ownership question head-on.

According to Nick, Malena had her own login to the account for years, plus a personal credit card tied to it. She could withdraw funds and send money under the same banking restrictions he had. What he refused was adding her as a legal co-owner of the account.

Nick said the judge agreed with him that this arrangement wasn’t financial abuse.

He doubled down with a blunt follow-up: “I don’t care, if she had full ownership there’d be zero $ left in the account today.” He added that he wasn’t going to relitigate the case online, but wanted to correct what he sees as misinformation.

The divorce itself appears to be largely settled in court. What changed this week is the audience. xQc’s stream dragged private, case-adjacent material in front of millions of viewers, and Nick had to step out publicly to defend how the court already ruled.

Explore More
Meet the Editor
mm
Senior Editor